Unfair flat tax
In the Nov. 19 Omaha World-Herald, Steve Jessen suggested Nebraska should go to a flat consumption tax because it would attract people to Nebraska.
Not true. A flat tax encourages people to save, not to spend, because if you wait and buy later, you will have more buying power because of interest earned on that money. So, it would not raise the amount of revenue they think it will. And what will the legislative body do when they don’t get that revenue? Raise the rate.
A flat tax will be unfair on the retired because they paid tax on the money when they earned it and then must pay tax again on that money when they spend it. This double taxation will encourage people to leave Nebraska.
Simplicity? A tax system of any kind can either be simple but not fair, or fair but not simple. When our income tax system started it was very simple. And then politicians started complicating it with what would be subject to that tax and what would not.
But more than anything, our current system taxes income. There are two positive aspects of taxing income.
One is that people who are earning money have new cash to spend. A flat tax taxes what you’ve already earned.
The other is the government can’t make that income tax rate too high or the taxpayer will not work or not work as much. Under a consumption tax you’re being taxed on your assets as you spend them. Think about that! The government has a way to take away those assets. Sure, they won’t take them until you spend them. But why do we build assets except to spend them?
Under a consumption tax the government is saying: “We have what it takes to take what you have.”
Not my idea of fair.
Michael McLaughlin, Omaha, Retired CPA
Nebraska’s tax problems
Critics of the EPIC consumption tax should not throw the baby out with the bath water. The current tax systems are broken due to excessive exemptions and complicated administration.
Years ago, former Nebraska Sen. Rich Pahls researched the state sales tax history and showed how the tax percentage rate would increase as more items became exempt. The same is also true of property and income taxes. All these exemptions are in the billions of dollars and represent the power of decades of lobbyists bending tax laws to their favor.
Some assume consumption taxes are the worst. This is not true. Omaha has had a restaurant tax, a form of consumption tax, for years resulting in diners paying about 9.68 percent in all taxes for eating, but the majority of this taxation is still the state sales tax, and diners don’t complain of not being able to pay. However, the overall taxes would be lower if it were not for the many exemptions in the sales tax.
The worst taxation is the property tax as it is not based on the ability to pay. This tax is so high, it obstructs Nebraska’s economy in the digital age. This is why at most Omaha City Council sessions there are businesses requesting relief through tax incremental financing known as TIF. The high property taxes also cause housing shortages and contribute to homelessness as landlords are forced to raise rents to cover property taxes.
So keep an open mind and learn about taxation systems and Nebraska’s tax problems. Consumption taxes provide a solution to the property tax problem.
Andrew L. Sullivan, Omaha
Extra kicks
I’m writing in regards to Gregg D. Rhoades’ letter, (Pulse, Nov. 17) about having only two more kicks to the groin as the only bright spot he could find for the Husker football team. He got a couple of extra kicks last week with the volleyball team getting swept by Wisconsin and the soccer team losing in OT to Stanford!
Gary Brehmer, Pender, Neb.
The world is watching
President Biden and Honorable Members of Congress,
As a concerned American citizen, I am compelled to express my deep distress and disappointment regarding the ongoing conflict and the role that our nation plays in it.
The images coming out of Gaza are heart-wrenching, especially the impact on innocent civilians, particularly children. It is with a heavy heart that I address you, questioning the ethical implications of our support for actions that lead to loss of life and widespread suffering.
It pains me to think that our tax dollars are contributing to the devastation in Gaza, where lives are being lost, families torn apart, and futures destroyed.
We are willing to keep sending more of our tax dollars to support the apartheid state of Israel that continues killing innocent civilians and continues with the illegal occupation of Palestine — while we keep cutting funds for basic needs in our country such as health care, veteran support, education funding. I could go on and on with the list of things that we are in dire need to support in our country.
The world is watching, and history will judge the decisions made during this critical time. Let’s not have the blood of all these children and all the innocent civilians on our hands.
I urge you to prioritize the sanctity of human life and to align our foreign policy with the values that America holds dear. Let us be remembered for promoting justice, compassion and the pursuit of lasting peace, rather than being associated with the tragedies that unfold in Gaza, Palestine.
Ayman Sharif, Omaha
The vision
The City Council and the mayor have a vision for decreasing traffic accidents, injuries and deaths. I sincerely hope that vision includes removing unlicensed drivers and unlicensed vehicles from the streets. The vision should include getting the vehicles that are wrecked and damaged without working tail lights, brake lights or head lights.
Riley Leary, Omaha
Refuse to sign
Nebraskans should refuse to sign the falsely named petition “Protect Our Rights.” If this petition gets on the ballot and passes it will deny the right to life of those in the womb through abortion. It goes against one of the principles of our nation’s founding document, the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.” One of the purposes of government is to protect these rights.
A clause in the 14th Amendment, known as the due process clause, says no state shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Abortion denies those in the womb of life, without due process of law, and if a state permits it that state is not providing equal protection of laws — since the murder of people who have been born is punishable by prison sentence or death, but the murder of lives in the womb through abortion is not punishable by the states where abortion is legal.
Anyone who denies that abortion kills a person is a science denier. I believe abortion is wrong not only because the Bible says so, but also the laws of the state prohibit murder, and natural law says that the purposeful killing of any one is murder except in the case of the death penalty imposed by the state as punishment for capital offences. The Bible permits the government to punish murderers by the taking of their lives.
Stephen Hillman, Omaha
Our holiday wishes
1. Congress decides to address the fact that the Social Security trust fund will be depleted by 2033. Swift congressional action adds 40 more years to the trust fund.
2. Trump apologizes for his degrading remarks about people who are different from him and asks for forgiveness.
3. The countries of the world unite to fight global warming after experiencing the hottest year on record in 2023.
4. People increase their respect for all people: African Americans, Asians, Jews, Muslims, gays, and immigrants. All people should be valued for their importance to our society.
5. Our democracy is saved by caring, reasonable, intelligent voters in the 2024 presidential election.
David and Barbara Daughton, Omaha